We have been implanted with nanotechnology without our consent. We should unite together and make a case for non-consentual implantation and experimentation
The nanotech cannot work for tracking and targeting persons and crowds without the 5G/6G/7G signals, but the nanoparticles and the hydrogels are surely toxic. The signals can still kill everyone in a targeted area even without the nanotech:
The courts are controlled by the same parties as the all governments, and after police and the military have been injected the toxins, their members can be remotely programmed against the people:
I've gone a share fest of a couple of your posts today. I watched a few interviews that of you on YouTube and and was blown away with the way you have dealt with what has been done to you. Healing arms sent to you and hopes that you find the solution. 🙏
2013 court Case Pathology vs Myriad Genetics in the US, the Supreme Court ruled that human DNA cannot be patented because it was a “product of nature.” But at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that if a human genome were changed by mRNA vaccines (which are currently being used) then the genome can be patented.
This means that everyone who has received the vaccine is now technically “patented” and something that is patented is proprietary and falls under the definition of “transhuman.” Those people who are legally identified as “transhuman” do not have access to Human Rights or any rights granted by the state.
This is because they are not classified as 100% organic or human. Therefore, technically, anyone who has this vaccine could no longer have access to human rights. There have been some legal documents discussing this recently so clarification should be available soon.
Can you lead us to anyone looking at the "Issue of Consent" and the implications of 'patented product placement without consent' due to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) / Patent law regarding "Consent". (We expect to use that approach here in one of the smallest OECD nations.) As of now, are you aware of any IPR lawyers taking this sort of case?
The biggest risk here is that you need to TRUST your "Smart Devices" and have cybersecurity. If you buy hardware from China, it has adversarial neurotechnology in it if you reside in any other country than China. If you buy China, you will become a cognitive slave or worse to them via neuroweapons (weaponized dual-use form of neurotechnology). This may also apply to other countries, but 100% China after their 2016 BRAIN initiative put them into the neurotechnology game and at same time other countries intelligence community members started to get shot up with neuroweapons to make a point.
None of the people who e-mailed me wrote "I emit a MAC address". Was my request not clear?
Even though I am familiar with the methodology, I will engage with a computer engineer to write a Substack "How to detect if I emit a MAC address". Please don't e-mail me if you don't have evidence of such emission.
Len: Your request was clear, but perhaps people considered it akin to saying they had leprosy in an email that gets scanned, indexed, stored forever by Google, etc. Perhaps a coded, more subtle subject term would yield better compliance. Keep up the great work! It is much appreciated.
I just read your paper. When I did my tests I used an app called nRFConnect . This app can display the data included in the beacon packets as well as RSSI time series plots. I am curious to know what signal level is observed, what data is carried, and whether the signal emanates from a particular location on the body.
I know a decent amount about Bluetooth and have looked for this but have yet to find any. I think some people may be fooled by many devices that emit packets using randomized addresses. To clarify this I would measure the signal strength and move the receiver to locate the source. I am very interested in this but have no evidence.
We "spoke" before about this MAC address topic on SH's Stack. I meant to write to you in the past to see how your experiment went with your "parental unit?"
While you are right that unknown MAC addresses can be emitted by many devices, it is not the case that we're being fooled here. Dr. Ber knows what he's talking about, and so do maaaany others. This is real; the vaxxed, and even some unvaxxed (explanations of which are under investigation - some theorize this happens through shedding) are very definitely emitting MAC addresses.
Agreed, but I prefer to use linux and command line wifi and bluetooth sniffers. The app is cool though, I just don't like putting stuff on my smartphone that I can't code verify. We're all stuck with big tech.
Hi Len. There is only one person that I know of who can actually establish that this technology does indeed exist in the body. She has actual medical proof. She, however, cannot find representation. I’m on board as well, but wouldn’t you first need to get verifiable documentation from a physician as opposed to attorney first? Also, is the doctor for Ana Toledo available? Also, TJ has listed on the website a bunch of doctors. Can any of them help as well?
I'd still be in on this I have bad very very bad v2k. My guess is it only does that because I have a mac address... But I have evidence this stuff is transmitted through the air and cable lines. and maybe hacked into our computers too...
How would someone know if they're emitting a MAC address, and if they are, how does that happen?
I wouldn't want to go through the trouble of testing for such emissions if I haven't been exposed to any risk.
The nanotech cannot work for tracking and targeting persons and crowds without the 5G/6G/7G signals, but the nanoparticles and the hydrogels are surely toxic. The signals can still kill everyone in a targeted area even without the nanotech:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/targeting-and-controlling-individuals
The courts are controlled by the same parties as the all governments, and after police and the military have been injected the toxins, their members can be remotely programmed against the people:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/psychotronic-and-electromagnetic
Where is a "we" with the power to change anything, especially when most of the attack on humanity is denied to exist?
http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.bioinformatics.20211101.01.html#SecAppendix
please help spread the word !
I've gone a share fest of a couple of your posts today. I watched a few interviews that of you on YouTube and and was blown away with the way you have dealt with what has been done to you. Healing arms sent to you and hopes that you find the solution. 🙏
More for you
2013 court Case Pathology vs Myriad Genetics in the US, the Supreme Court ruled that human DNA cannot be patented because it was a “product of nature.” But at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that if a human genome were changed by mRNA vaccines (which are currently being used) then the genome can be patented.
This means that everyone who has received the vaccine is now technically “patented” and something that is patented is proprietary and falls under the definition of “transhuman.” Those people who are legally identified as “transhuman” do not have access to Human Rights or any rights granted by the state.
This is because they are not classified as 100% organic or human. Therefore, technically, anyone who has this vaccine could no longer have access to human rights. There have been some legal documents discussing this recently so clarification should be available soon.
Can you lead us to anyone looking at the "Issue of Consent" and the implications of 'patented product placement without consent' due to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) / Patent law regarding "Consent". (We expect to use that approach here in one of the smallest OECD nations.) As of now, are you aware of any IPR lawyers taking this sort of case?
The biggest risk here is that you need to TRUST your "Smart Devices" and have cybersecurity. If you buy hardware from China, it has adversarial neurotechnology in it if you reside in any other country than China. If you buy China, you will become a cognitive slave or worse to them via neuroweapons (weaponized dual-use form of neurotechnology). This may also apply to other countries, but 100% China after their 2016 BRAIN initiative put them into the neurotechnology game and at same time other countries intelligence community members started to get shot up with neuroweapons to make a point.
In your living quarters you are surrounded by technology. Do you emit address when out in the wilderness?
Scanned address came up
90:DD:5D:8C:7D:33 - In bedroom where I scanned.
Number E8:CA:C8:0A:7B:89 - came up ,
" in Kitchen, " at the same time.
I was in the bedroom.
None of the people who e-mailed me wrote "I emit a MAC address". Was my request not clear?
Even though I am familiar with the methodology, I will engage with a computer engineer to write a Substack "How to detect if I emit a MAC address". Please don't e-mail me if you don't have evidence of such emission.
Len: Your request was clear, but perhaps people considered it akin to saying they had leprosy in an email that gets scanned, indexed, stored forever by Google, etc. Perhaps a coded, more subtle subject term would yield better compliance. Keep up the great work! It is much appreciated.
Not everybody is on the big tech wagon (Google, Microsoft, etc.). Check out Switzerland and Panama based encrypted email options.
I love finding these knowledge nuggets of yours wherever I go, Brandon. 😀
Checking out Panama right now.
I just read your paper. When I did my tests I used an app called nRFConnect . This app can display the data included in the beacon packets as well as RSSI time series plots. I am curious to know what signal level is observed, what data is carried, and whether the signal emanates from a particular location on the body.
I know a decent amount about Bluetooth and have looked for this but have yet to find any. I think some people may be fooled by many devices that emit packets using randomized addresses. To clarify this I would measure the signal strength and move the receiver to locate the source. I am very interested in this but have no evidence.
Hi Fork!
We "spoke" before about this MAC address topic on SH's Stack. I meant to write to you in the past to see how your experiment went with your "parental unit?"
While you are right that unknown MAC addresses can be emitted by many devices, it is not the case that we're being fooled here. Dr. Ber knows what he's talking about, and so do maaaany others. This is real; the vaxxed, and even some unvaxxed (explanations of which are under investigation - some theorize this happens through shedding) are very definitely emitting MAC addresses.
Kali Linux (purple) can be utilized to detect this.
A smartphone with a BLE scanner app will do already.
I'm in IT and I didn't even bother with Kali.
I can see all I need to see with my Android, and so can others.
Agreed, but I prefer to use linux and command line wifi and bluetooth sniffers. The app is cool though, I just don't like putting stuff on my smartphone that I can't code verify. We're all stuck with big tech.
It's easy, install a BLE scanner app on your smartphone.
Walk into a forest, scan, look if you see a MAC address.
The goal of walking into the forest is to have nobody around you for at least 100 meters.
Here is a video with more information for those that are interested, though those 3 lines I wrote above, are already enough to get going.
https://odysee.com/@wickedtruths:2/All-about-the-vaccinated-emitting-Bluetooth-MAC-addresses:e
That article has nothing to do with what we are talking about here...makes me think you're a bot.
Thank you Dr.Ber. You can count me in.
in order to be counted you need to emit a MAC address. Do you?
I believe the chemtrails that saturated/still cover the skies…= Covid 19. . Respiratory infections =chemtrails. Been called a conspiracy theory.
Just use an Android phone to scan for new bluetooth devices and you'll see what your transmitting.
Hi Len. There is only one person that I know of who can actually establish that this technology does indeed exist in the body. She has actual medical proof. She, however, cannot find representation. I’m on board as well, but wouldn’t you first need to get verifiable documentation from a physician as opposed to attorney first? Also, is the doctor for Ana Toledo available? Also, TJ has listed on the website a bunch of doctors. Can any of them help as well?
anyways yeah Len count me in. I can add my audio and other proofs of how it's transmitted...
I'd still be in on this I have bad very very bad v2k. My guess is it only does that because I have a mac address... But I have evidence this stuff is transmitted through the air and cable lines. and maybe hacked into our computers too...