Justice Gorsuch makes a memorable speech during the recent Oral Arguments in FBI v. FIKRE - one of the many TSDB cases on their way to the Supreme Court.
yeah took two days since I was tired when I fir began reading that document. Yeah it's not moot, they didn't take the guy off until after he'd filed suit. So, no it's not moot. I think he should get why when and by whom he was placed on the no Fly list, plus told what he needs to do to not get back on. plus I think some full on change needs to be done. I read parts of that other document too of the black guy whistleblower. It tells me that anyone with or without a criminal background, plus using technology they will give you a criminal background or any kind of criminal accusation they orchestrated to begin with. they are all very corrupt.
I've had and my v2k has gotten louder but I have an Army truck sitting outside it has an Army emblem so it's not just a sticker. No one lives in the house not since the kid there committed suicide, and is for sale. No lights are ever on so he's not parked there for the house. I'm going to investigate him some tomorrow unless he's a gangstalker and moves or questions me. Before you say big deal the Army is big in gangstalking and v2k and child sex trafficking so...
yeah this list needs overhauled and come under some kind of scrutiny that makes it clearer just what is called and act of terrorism. This MR Joshi is a piece of shit. It's clear that very vague and very opinionated or prejudice is a factor in all of this. These fuckers are criminals they need their balls cut off and fed to them. Hypocrites and baby sex traffickers they all are. Plus necrophiliacs from what I read from other v2k files that's been done.
Plus these sons of bitches OMFG this makes me pissed. But these sons of Bitches wont divulge what it is beyond him or her holding a fund raiser for a Mosk. Meaning what entirety was it that they used to place him on this list to start with? OMFG the smugness of these sons of bitches pisses me off...
I'm reading the case log questions, and Not surprised how double talk the defendants are. Plus they're insistence of how the claim is moot since they supposedly took him or her of the no fly list, what a bunch of shit. The Govt's claim on how it wasn't his giving money or holding a fundraiser for this Mosk, is just puke... God I hate how lawyers do things. I mean how they twist things it makes me sick.
I like how Thomas asks his questions and even though I don't like Sotemeyer, I like how she asks and makes statements too. Not sure I will read the full 90 pages but I like it so far.
Of course you know that the Executive Branch always claims this position regardless of party! And the senator who wrote about the TSDB is a democrat and those who are bringing it up before the Senate vote are left wing progressive democrats (like me). I believe Elizabeth Warren is in charge and she is a lawyer who taught at Harvard for years and has written text books that my son had to read in law school. I mention this bc TJ has a reputation of being very far to the right and members were told to only write to the repubs on the House Subcommittee on the weaponization of the federal government. And we all know how effective that was & how dysfunctional the House has been ever since the Repubs took over. But sometimes the far right and far left make strange bedfellows as they have on the Fisa issue. Now the SCOTUS is far right but they are a special breed who could easily rule either way!
I don’t think most want to understand, and those who do such as politicians, FBI, CIA and DoD officers were selected because they are either simpletons or soulless; mentally ill either way.
I also don’t think most civilians understand that there are several “target lists” with many bought assets doing the targeting—some who understand some of what’s happening and some who are completely oblivious; all compartmentalized and totally controlled, and all with soulless lawyers and judges who also understand at the very center of it, but are money & power-junkies with a forced belief that there are too many (overpopulation) and that humanity is to blame, so therefore—who cares who gets targeted or destroyed, humanity deserves it. It’s so warped.
It’s best to chalk it up to madness. Calling it evil by legal terms or in a court only helps those at the very top of the Eugenicist pyramid keep the wars going indefinitely.
When in Rome… But still, I’m so just me wanting nothing more than to be free…to be me. Nothing more. Nothing less. When in Rome…or wherever home may be at the moment.
But I’m sincere, and I thought I was constructive. Perhaps I’m missing it. I’m not making fun, just saying I’m not easily molded, shamed or punished to conform, with or without the targeting. When in Rome means—do as the Romans do, when in Rome. At least I think. I’ve never liked the thought of having to conform, but I get respecting a communities culture & standards, so long as I’m not stripped of my identity or threatened. It’s what I’ve always liked about a diversified America. Natural diversity is very attractive, with the right to associate or disassociate, without fear or coercion. In any case, no disrespect. I’ll post on your substack more, less, seldom or never per your wishes, just as if I went to your tavern with a dress code. Just give me specific guidelines and I will respect them. Promise.
Nothing personal against you, Jeffrey. I understand the angle you are coming from.
My comment "In Rome" meant to refer to the judicial system that we are currently fighting in. The rules in it are not what you'd expect in a common sense conversation. Cases are dismissed based on judge's ignorance, or worse. So we have to play their legal game.
I don't see the Executive branch fighting for us.
I don't see the Legislative branch fighting for us.
So what's left is our Judicial Branch that plays by certain rules, and we need to use these rules to our advantage.
yeah took two days since I was tired when I fir began reading that document. Yeah it's not moot, they didn't take the guy off until after he'd filed suit. So, no it's not moot. I think he should get why when and by whom he was placed on the no Fly list, plus told what he needs to do to not get back on. plus I think some full on change needs to be done. I read parts of that other document too of the black guy whistleblower. It tells me that anyone with or without a criminal background, plus using technology they will give you a criminal background or any kind of criminal accusation they orchestrated to begin with. they are all very corrupt.
I've had and my v2k has gotten louder but I have an Army truck sitting outside it has an Army emblem so it's not just a sticker. No one lives in the house not since the kid there committed suicide, and is for sale. No lights are ever on so he's not parked there for the house. I'm going to investigate him some tomorrow unless he's a gangstalker and moves or questions me. Before you say big deal the Army is big in gangstalking and v2k and child sex trafficking so...
yeah this list needs overhauled and come under some kind of scrutiny that makes it clearer just what is called and act of terrorism. This MR Joshi is a piece of shit. It's clear that very vague and very opinionated or prejudice is a factor in all of this. These fuckers are criminals they need their balls cut off and fed to them. Hypocrites and baby sex traffickers they all are. Plus necrophiliacs from what I read from other v2k files that's been done.
Plus these sons of bitches OMFG this makes me pissed. But these sons of Bitches wont divulge what it is beyond him or her holding a fund raiser for a Mosk. Meaning what entirety was it that they used to place him on this list to start with? OMFG the smugness of these sons of bitches pisses me off...
I'm reading the case log questions, and Not surprised how double talk the defendants are. Plus they're insistence of how the claim is moot since they supposedly took him or her of the no fly list, what a bunch of shit. The Govt's claim on how it wasn't his giving money or holding a fundraiser for this Mosk, is just puke... God I hate how lawyers do things. I mean how they twist things it makes me sick.
I like how Thomas asks his questions and even though I don't like Sotemeyer, I like how she asks and makes statements too. Not sure I will read the full 90 pages but I like it so far.
Of course you know that the Executive Branch always claims this position regardless of party! And the senator who wrote about the TSDB is a democrat and those who are bringing it up before the Senate vote are left wing progressive democrats (like me). I believe Elizabeth Warren is in charge and she is a lawyer who taught at Harvard for years and has written text books that my son had to read in law school. I mention this bc TJ has a reputation of being very far to the right and members were told to only write to the repubs on the House Subcommittee on the weaponization of the federal government. And we all know how effective that was & how dysfunctional the House has been ever since the Repubs took over. But sometimes the far right and far left make strange bedfellows as they have on the Fisa issue. Now the SCOTUS is far right but they are a special breed who could easily rule either way!
I don’t think most want to understand, and those who do such as politicians, FBI, CIA and DoD officers were selected because they are either simpletons or soulless; mentally ill either way.
I also don’t think most civilians understand that there are several “target lists” with many bought assets doing the targeting—some who understand some of what’s happening and some who are completely oblivious; all compartmentalized and totally controlled, and all with soulless lawyers and judges who also understand at the very center of it, but are money & power-junkies with a forced belief that there are too many (overpopulation) and that humanity is to blame, so therefore—who cares who gets targeted or destroyed, humanity deserves it. It’s so warped.
It’s best to chalk it up to madness. Calling it evil by legal terms or in a court only helps those at the very top of the Eugenicist pyramid keep the wars going indefinitely.
When in Rome..
When in Rome… But still, I’m so just me wanting nothing more than to be free…to be me. Nothing more. Nothing less. When in Rome…or wherever home may be at the moment.
I’d like something constructive please
But I’m sincere, and I thought I was constructive. Perhaps I’m missing it. I’m not making fun, just saying I’m not easily molded, shamed or punished to conform, with or without the targeting. When in Rome means—do as the Romans do, when in Rome. At least I think. I’ve never liked the thought of having to conform, but I get respecting a communities culture & standards, so long as I’m not stripped of my identity or threatened. It’s what I’ve always liked about a diversified America. Natural diversity is very attractive, with the right to associate or disassociate, without fear or coercion. In any case, no disrespect. I’ll post on your substack more, less, seldom or never per your wishes, just as if I went to your tavern with a dress code. Just give me specific guidelines and I will respect them. Promise.
Nothing personal against you, Jeffrey. I understand the angle you are coming from.
My comment "In Rome" meant to refer to the judicial system that we are currently fighting in. The rules in it are not what you'd expect in a common sense conversation. Cases are dismissed based on judge's ignorance, or worse. So we have to play their legal game.
I don't see the Executive branch fighting for us.
I don't see the Legislative branch fighting for us.
So what's left is our Judicial Branch that plays by certain rules, and we need to use these rules to our advantage.
Thank you, doc. I respect you and Ana and the work you do a great deal. Wouldn’t want to give you any other impression.