Why Do We Call #TJvGarland Historic?
Because Due Process Clause is at Stake!
Have you noticed, every time I mention the lawsuit “Targeted Justice versus Garland”, I refer to it as historic. Some may think it’s puffery, but it is not.
Here is why.
Historic is referring to something momentous or important in history. There is no doubt that this legal case will change the course of history. Only a superficial reading of the pleadings would give someone an impression that the case is only about Targeted Individuals.
(Targeted Indivudual is someone who is being subjected of overt and covert surveillance, psyops, inhumane torture using directed energy weapons and v2k, social engineering, disruption and interfering with one’s electronic communication and financial transactions, equal employment opportunity, often leading to destitution, homelessness, social isolation; and includes advanced forms of neurological biosurveillance and intervention,
if you are versed in the history of the 20th century you’ll quickly draw a parallel between Targeting and Zersetzung (Decomposition in German), a hallmark of Stasi program conducted in East Germany all up to the Fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.)
So is the primary pleading in the lawsuit about Targeted Individuals? Not quite. The primary pleadings in the case are such as that the 18 plaintiffs have been illegally put on an unconstitutional “non-investigative subject” portion of TSDB (Terrorist Searching DataBase) maintained by the FBI.
By its own admission, the bureau uses secret criteria not available to the public to put law-abiding Americans who are neither terrorists nor suspected terrorists (categories for which the criteria are public) on TSDB. It’s done in secret, without notifying the person about their addition to the list, without regulations and without the redress process to remove their names from the list. The names are added, and never removed, sentencing the person to be a subject of Targeting (some partially, some to all its elements - see description above). Also by FBI's own admission, the people on that list "don't represent a terrorist risk".
Imagine this could be you… and why not? The criteria are secret, and you’ll never be notified!
Thus, the core issue of the case applies to every American. Remember McCarthy list? It’s exactly like that!
The idea that this is what’s going on is so scandalously unconstitutional, that most of us would dismiss it as unbelievable. And yet, the filings in the lawsuit demonstrate the opposite.
What’s really at stake in this lawsuit is our fundamental constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment's due process clause that prohibits the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property" by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law.
I bet you would like to keep this right, wouldn’t you? I have news for you: it’s already been taken away, as the lawsuit filings demonstrate it.
But here's the kicker.
The right to Due Process cannot be taken away from us by the government! Because the government never gave us this right! You can’t take away something you didn’t give!
A king didn’t give us this right. The government didn’t give us this right. “We The People” gave this right to ourselves. Not the other way around!
These unacknowledged Mafia groups in the deep National Security State are already sending out UFOs that are engaging with our Military fighter jets. They are creating bio machines that can be used as an army with weapons. We are in eminent danger of losing this country to them. Our president, with what’s left of the good military needs to hunt down these unacknowledged groups- track the money trail and put an end to this fascist takeover. They are committing psychological warfare against animals and people. Our government needs to stop the psych ops programs and the use if neuroweapons and declassify most of the worlds secrets. This would help our government be for the people by the people instead of for the military industrial complex. Get rid of the maggots in the deep state. The most dangerous threat we face is by this Mafia take over, not by Aliens. The aliens could have destroyed us years ago if they wanted to.
Permit me to tell you why I call this lawsuit historical. How is it possible that government entities would accidentally torture US citizens for 20 years while simultaneously leaving the borders open to any terrorist who might walk into the country? That in itself should tell you there is more going on here than meets the eye & the narrative we were given is a lie.
Simply stated; 9/11 was a false flag event to circumvent the US Constitution with the "Patriot Act"for global governance through the UN & the bigger issue here is that the "Patriot Act" is unconstitutional & seeing as how the US Constitution is the highest law in the land, therefore illegal. Furthermore, this isn't guesswork on my part, THEY SAID SO IN THEIR OWN WORDS IN 1974.
"... but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. The hopeful aspect of the present situation is that even as nations resist appeals for "world government" and "the surrender of sovereignty," technological, economic and political interests are forcing them ... "As in the case of the U.S. Constitution, we are more likely to make progress by pressing the existing instrument to the outer limits of its potentialities through creative use, seeking amendments only on carefully selected matters where they seem both necessary and capable of adoption by the constitutionally required majority." ~ Council on Foreign Relations, Foreign Affairs, April 1974
I encourage you to read the entire article:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k7QGUFp7dzmqRwzSXLV0M9GmiFMwCU_l/view?usp=drive_link
This amounts to TREASON, and yet it is still on their website:
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/hard-road-world-order
If that isn't damning enough, 9/11 wasn't the first first time they attempted to circumvent the US Constitution with a false flag, The Oklahoma Bombing was:
"Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Counterterrorism_Act_of_1995
But it didn't pass. And guess who submitted that:
"The Many Occasions Joe Biden Took Credit For Writing The Patriot Act"
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/andrewkaczynski/surveillance-joe
And because the Omnibus didn't pass, they went so far as to discuss how they would have to attempt it again in September of 2000:
"The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C., that focused on United States foreign policy. Of the twenty-five people who signed PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz."
"Written before the September 11 attacks and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
That "catastrophic and catalyzing event" was 9/11, exactly one year later.
I hope everyone understands this - Targets are the collateral damage of a Globalist takeover of the United States of America & this lawsuit is the first step in exposing this agenda. It is without a doubt worthy of mention in history books yet to come.