Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jeffrey p lubina's avatar

That’s right, Ana. It’s about how “they” frame the argument plus “what they are NOT saying” in contrast to what’s being repeated by the talking-heads controlling information related to “perceived threats.” Both the media & government Lawyers are very skilled in “manipulating language” and prioritizing what’s important vs. deadly-dangerous problems not even on the list; Soros, Gates, Schwab, Rockefeller, Rothschild…their bought politicians & investigative reporters & cops; the scarcity-creating, media-controlling disease & war profiteers.

What and who is really the threat humanity should be aware of? The lawyers & engineers of language and maritime law & courts. It’s not an accident the majority people are so divided, delusional and resistant to truth, meanwhile finding themselves battling life itself every generation.

Expand full comment
TreeTomato's avatar

Great news! I wonder how this will affect non-US people. Surely, NO non-investigative subjects, who are not a threat, should be on the database.

I have heard rumours that 5-Eyes is to end. I would imagine that this would end the FISA anyway. Here's hoping.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts