Hydrogel is the “Bodily Fluid” of Synthetic Biology
Full Blown Invasion
Our bodies can only function when the internal environment has some fluidity to it. Blood (both arterial and venous), lymph, tissue fluid, intracellular fluid, brain fluid, spinal fluid, joint fluid, etc. Without fluidity, things are stationary, red blood cells cannot deliver oxygen, blood cannot deliver glucose, immune cells cannot reach antigens, likewise, antibodies or killer cells cannot reach the targets. Tissue lacking fluidity dies off. Body without fluid environment dies off. Any movement requires fluidity.
What I observed in my limited experience as a microscopist, is that any movement stops when the slide dries out, when the water evaporates.
But in some slides, the movement doesn’t stop. It continues beyond any expectations, which is 2-3 days. How is it possible?
You guessed it right - hydrogel. Polymers that create hydrogel, retain water for a much, much longer period. So far, I have not seen it stoping for 3 months, and I have a suspicion that it will last longer.
Let’s set aside for a minute the fact that the things I observe moving moving in this hydrogel environment is synthetic biology aka technology. Conventional biology cannot keep moving without fulfilling its metabolic requirements. And all metabolic substrate would be consumed in confined micro spaces in which these moving micro-scale nanotechnology has been showed to remain kinetic.
So, this begs a hypothesis - is hydrogel a preferred substrate of synthetic biology?
Below - 7 day old blood slide - nothing should be moving, but it does (500x, phase-contrast microscopy):
Thank you for your work.
Let me also ask you the question that I have asked Matt (I skipped Mihalcea, because I don't think she would respond, but you might be lucker than I would be):
What can be done about being accused that Mihalcea, Matt's Microscopy, you, and a small number of other people, are no more convincing than virologists, who are also using microscopic images/videos to illustrate phenomena?
I personally believe that you and most others are covering facts, because your findings fit into my deductive conjecturing that preceded the findings by several months:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-path-to-my-current-standing-an
Whatever this material is, it does not appear to engage in cellular respiration and does not seem to use Kreb's cycle for the creation of energy. It appears to harvest energy from EMR which presumably comes from multiple sources. The fact that it continues in cadavers and on slides in which all traditionally living tissue/fluid is long dead, is very suggestive of this presumption.
This technology appears to be active in biological systems (I like your term KAMS) but is not actually alive itself, according to the traditional criteria (6 basic elements are generally cited that must be met in order for an entity to be considered a living organism). While there are debates about whether these criteria are adequate, they have been recognized for centuries.
I think you are asking the right questions.