Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Thank you for your work.

Let me also ask you the question that I have asked Matt (I skipped Mihalcea, because I don't think she would respond, but you might be lucker than I would be):

What can be done about being accused that Mihalcea, Matt's Microscopy, you, and a small number of other people, are no more convincing than virologists, who are also using microscopic images/videos to illustrate phenomena?

I personally believe that you and most others are covering facts, because your findings fit into my deductive conjecturing that preceded the findings by several months:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-path-to-my-current-standing-an

Expand full comment
John H.'s avatar

Whatever this material is, it does not appear to engage in cellular respiration and does not seem to use Kreb's cycle for the creation of energy. It appears to harvest energy from EMR which presumably comes from multiple sources. The fact that it continues in cadavers and on slides in which all traditionally living tissue/fluid is long dead, is very suggestive of this presumption.

This technology appears to be active in biological systems (I like your term KAMS) but is not actually alive itself, according to the traditional criteria (6 basic elements are generally cited that must be met in order for an entity to be considered a living organism). While there are debates about whether these criteria are adequate, they have been recognized for centuries.

I think you are asking the right questions.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts