Hematologist Challenge
Hematologists Who Refuse To Diagnose Abnormalities in Their Patients' Blood - Get Ready To Answer For A Colossal Failure of Your Professional Competence!
By publishing this substack, I am declaring a new campaign to force mainstream hematologists to take notice of the abnormalities in their patients’ blood, such as the one below (200x, phase contrast microscopy of a blood smear, 12 DAYS FOLLOWING SLIDE PREPARATION):
My personal background is hematology and endocrinology, and even though I have not practiced for 30 years, I can still “scope”, and and I know my way around blood cells.
First, I went to see a local suburban hematologist because there was no wait. I wrote a substack about it:
My local hematologist was extremely puzzled by what he was seeing and told me: “You need to see Dr Stein downtown”, to which I said: “Already on it! it’s just that the waiting time is so long - 4 months”. And then, the appointment day arrived.
If you ever saw a doctor who couldn’t wait to get rid of you, that was a classic case of that. Dr. Stein’s lack of curiosity was so painful to experience. His line of reasoning was so excruciatingly dull: “ We don’t get patients who do their own blood microscopy”…. (oh wait We Just Found A Problem)… to which I said - now you do.
Dr Stein also said this is not a part of normal blood, so I don’t have any idea what it is.
”But Doctor, it is IN the blood”. I didn’t go with this to a podiatrist. If any specialist could tell me what’s in my blood, it’s you - a hematologist, aren’t you?
”Well, I have not been educated on it.”
”So, when did you stop your education, Dr. Stein? This year? Three years ago?”
The conversation wasn’t going anywhere. Dr. Stein already arrived to his conclusion - he doesn’t need to do anything. And this when I spoke my mind: “Shame on you”.
That’s ok, nobody was raising their voice, no chairs were thrown. But the elephant in the room could not be ignored - total lack of curiosity, and palpable snobbery that this shining star of the Northwestern Medicine was exhibiting.
I see these moving particle which I named KAMS (Kinetically Active Micro Structures, for a lack of a better term) in every person’s blood that I have looked since August 2023. I will take a look at your blood, give you a video, and you are welcome to challenge your hematologist. There are people around the country that do live blood analysis, and all you have to do is to ask them to take a video of your blood 2-3-4 days after the preparation of the slide to show these abnormally moving particles.
I want Hematologists to start talking about this phenomenon instead of sweeping it under the rug. I refuse to believe that all hematologists would have the same attitude as Dr. Brady Stein. Perhaps other hematologists in the same office would have a different reaction.
I want this substack to go viral. I want YOU to produce the same evidence I produced and go challenge your hematologist. They cannot ignore the video - the motion (not a brownian motion!) is undeniable, and it is not supposed to be there. Everything should be static within the first 24 hours.
Let this be the topic that stirrs up the hematologist community. If the doctor brushed you off, contact his or her supervisor. Your message should be plain and simple: There are things in my blood that are not supposed to be there. What’s my diagnosis?
I can envision a scenario where hematologists will requests their administrators to get educational courses in nanotechnology, WBAN, MAC Address Emission Phenomenon. All it takes is a decent curious professional who takes his occupation seriously.
Some people might say - you are making it personal. Heck yeah. It is your personal blood. And you are asking a person who claims to be a specialist about what’s taking place in your blood (and charging you money for it). Under what conditions you would pay for a diagnosis “I don’t know”? That’s as good as asking your neighbor! So yeah, to maintain their good name hematologists should have personal stake in the game!
I am sure you will find 100s of excuses not do this “hematologist challenge”. And this is exactly what people behind this technology are counting on - on your complacency, and laziness. Show that it’s not who you are!
Hi Len, I am willing to try the experiment and look for what you are calling KAMS, I just need to know, are these KAMS in some fluid which has not entirely evaporated, or maybe in some other fluid which doesn't evaporate? Do you have a method sheet of some kind to reproduce your results that I could follow?
The problem is in the "science," not in the competence...
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/diagnostic-failures-reveal-inadequacies