Shawn Paul Melville has recently trolled me, “challenging” the validity of a chart I posted, and then became evasive switching tracks after I responded, just like he did with Dr. Ber. He has this attitude typical of most bullies who “insist” on having their way—then the final, sarcastic word—and if that doesn’t work, demand the right to shut down further debate with force & punishment to set their opinion or “fact(s)” in stone never to be challenged or changed, or else. It’s smacks of WHO poo.
It’s very similar to what happens after every FalseFlag event the media and government manufactures, then immediately begins to gaslight & punish anyone who questions their set narratives outlined in widely broadcasted and accepted scripts. I’ve never reacted “typically” to bullies, and they just hate it, particularly the mainstream media and government bullies who’ve provided most of my training over the years. Truly, Shawn’s way out of his league and doesn’t seem to understand this fact, in spite of someone insisting he’s at his “optimal state of health.” My closest associates already smell blood, like observing a toad about to hop (get thrown) out in front of traffic—figuratively of course. I really do hate real blood.
Most humans doing REAL scientific research that can be challenged, without manipulation or threats, begin with uncertainty and speculation—the catalyst which created scientific research in the first place going back thousands of years. Correct? I got my very first microscope in grade school. So no matter an individual’s level of education or what they are researching, whether we’re talking about established physics-facts not even requiring a telescope, such as “spherical vs. flat earth nonsense,” or questioning the existence of dark matter or black holes…or attempting to understand an unknown, atypical, abnormal “anomaly or artifact” appearing in a medicine or blood samples that should NOT be there, nobody should be stifling or shutting down debate for those who wish to continue their own studies and ask more questions.
It’s crazy that some believe they have the right to intrude, interrupt or bully you mid-experiment insisting that you “MUST Understand with absolute certainty” before questioning and sharing with colleagues or the general public findings loaded with speculation to get their opinions and input, not to mention more speculative questions in retort. All scientific discovery which develops into a better “understanding” begins with “speculation” and shared ideas. So what the hell’s Shawn’s real problem, poor mental health?
I’m very protective and in total support of real humans questioning their universe, particularly their own governments. People like Shawn, who may have some valid points, but incapable of shutting his speak-hole after completing his sentence to allow for equal time makes no sense to me. And that’s too bad, because humanity desperately needs all the help it can get from every individual on earth, unafraid of real science methodology loaded with speculation and unlimited, legitimate competition.
Best illustration of a quote I will now butcher.
Its better to keep your mouth shut and let them think you are a fool,
Than open your mouth and prove it.
Thank you for my daily dose of humor Sir.
Shawn Paul Melville has recently trolled me, “challenging” the validity of a chart I posted, and then became evasive switching tracks after I responded, just like he did with Dr. Ber. He has this attitude typical of most bullies who “insist” on having their way—then the final, sarcastic word—and if that doesn’t work, demand the right to shut down further debate with force & punishment to set their opinion or “fact(s)” in stone never to be challenged or changed, or else. It’s smacks of WHO poo.
It’s very similar to what happens after every FalseFlag event the media and government manufactures, then immediately begins to gaslight & punish anyone who questions their set narratives outlined in widely broadcasted and accepted scripts. I’ve never reacted “typically” to bullies, and they just hate it, particularly the mainstream media and government bullies who’ve provided most of my training over the years. Truly, Shawn’s way out of his league and doesn’t seem to understand this fact, in spite of someone insisting he’s at his “optimal state of health.” My closest associates already smell blood, like observing a toad about to hop (get thrown) out in front of traffic—figuratively of course. I really do hate real blood.
Most humans doing REAL scientific research that can be challenged, without manipulation or threats, begin with uncertainty and speculation—the catalyst which created scientific research in the first place going back thousands of years. Correct? I got my very first microscope in grade school. So no matter an individual’s level of education or what they are researching, whether we’re talking about established physics-facts not even requiring a telescope, such as “spherical vs. flat earth nonsense,” or questioning the existence of dark matter or black holes…or attempting to understand an unknown, atypical, abnormal “anomaly or artifact” appearing in a medicine or blood samples that should NOT be there, nobody should be stifling or shutting down debate for those who wish to continue their own studies and ask more questions.
It’s crazy that some believe they have the right to intrude, interrupt or bully you mid-experiment insisting that you “MUST Understand with absolute certainty” before questioning and sharing with colleagues or the general public findings loaded with speculation to get their opinions and input, not to mention more speculative questions in retort. All scientific discovery which develops into a better “understanding” begins with “speculation” and shared ideas. So what the hell’s Shawn’s real problem, poor mental health?
I’m very protective and in total support of real humans questioning their universe, particularly their own governments. People like Shawn, who may have some valid points, but incapable of shutting his speak-hole after completing his sentence to allow for equal time makes no sense to me. And that’s too bad, because humanity desperately needs all the help it can get from every individual on earth, unafraid of real science methodology loaded with speculation and unlimited, legitimate competition.